Warren Commission (13 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIII (of 15) — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   1180
United States. Warren Commission Project Gutenberg 2018 Not confirmed
Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination; Oswald, Lee Harvey Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 319,091
Reading time 1388 min
Text sections 63

The source record for Warren Commission (13 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIII (of 15) — A Reader’s Guide measures this digital text at 319,091 words, 23 hr 8 min estimated reading time, and 63 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 15.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Explore this collection

Compare your next read

These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.

Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →

How these choices and excerpts are prepared

Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.

Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.

Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 99 public books, 99 available source excerpts.

Volume XIII of the Warren Commission hearings contains testimony from witnesses to Jack Ruby's arrest and the shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald, including police officers, news media personnel, and janitorial staff, revealing the granular, often uncertain recollections of those present.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Public-domain source text

Read the source text

The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.

Volume XIII of the Warren Commission hearings presents testimony from witnesses directly involved in the arrest and questioning of Jack Ruby and the shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald. Unlike the Commission's final report, these transcripts capture the raw, often hesitant voices of police officers, newsmen, and building employees as they recount events under oath. The testimony of parking lot attendant L. C. Reeves, for instance, reveals the difficulty of establishing precise timelines and the frequent reliance on vague memory—Reeves cannot recall names, dates, or even whether he overheard a phone conversation. This volume offers a granular look at how evidence was gathered, with counsel probing every inconsistency.

Witnesses and Their Recollections

The preface lists witnesses whose testimony appears in this volume: L. C. Graves, James Robert Leavelle, L. D. Montgomery, Thomas Donald McMillon, and Forrest V. Sorrels—all involved in Ruby's arrest. Others, like Dr. Fred A. Bieberdorf and Frances Cason, testified about the time Oswald was shot. News media personnel Ira Jefferson Beers Jr., Robert Leonard Hankal, and Robert S. Huffaker Jr. observed the shooting. Janitorial employees of the Dallas Municipal Building—Harold R. Fuqua, Edward Kelly, Louis McKinzie, and others—gave testimony on how Ruby may have entered the building. Their accounts are not presented as definitive narratives but as fragmented pieces that the Commission sought to assemble.

The Texture of Testimony: L. C. Reeves

The excerpt from L. C. Reeves's testimony illustrates the challenges of oral evidence. Reeves, a parking lot attendant, describes a phone call from Jack Ruby on November 23, 1963. His answers are punctuated with uncertainty: “I don’t remember,” “I wouldn’t know for sure,” “I don’t just remember.” He cannot recall the name of a woman who borrowed $5, nor whether her husband was present. Counsel Leon D. Hubert Jr. presses for details, but Reeves’s memory is porous. He states, “I didn’t think about having to go through this,” suggesting the testimony was an unwelcome imposition. The exchange reveals how the Commission relied on witnesses whose daily routines were interrupted by historic events, and whose recollections were often imprecise.

Structure and Scope of the Volume

This volume is one of fifteen hearing volumes, part of a 26-volume set. It contains testimony from 63 text sections, totaling over 319,000 words. The formal structure—preface, witness list, transcribed Q&A—reflects the Commission's legalistic approach. Each witness is examined by counsel, with questions designed to elicit specific facts. Yet the transcripts also capture the human element: witnesses’ hesitations, corrections, and admissions of ignorance. The volume does not offer analysis or conclusions; it presents raw data. Readers must weigh the credibility of each account, noting where testimony aligns or contradicts other evidence. The catalog subjects—Kennedy assassination and Lee Harvey Oswald—frame the content, but the excerpts show that the volume’s focus is equally on the process of investigation.

Readers approaching this volume should attend to the interplay between the Commission's orderly framework and the messy reality of human memory. The testimony does not speak for itself; it requires careful reading to distinguish between what witnesses knew, what they inferred, and what they forgot. This is not a narrative but a source document—one that rewards patience and skepticism.

After finishing those hearings, I kept thinking about how even the people closest to a moment can’t quite agree on what they saw. It reminded me of something quieter I stumbled on later, Behind the prison bars — Reading Notes, where memory feels just as fragile, just as human. That same hush of uncertainty stayed with me long after.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks