The Revenue Act of 1918 imposed a 2-cent tax per $100 on drafts, checks payable otherwise than at sight, and promissory notes. This 1919 guide from Guaranty Trust Company of New York parses the law with a lawyer's precision, distinguishing taxable renewals from mere forbearance and clarifying that liability is determined by the instrument's face, not extrinsic facts. The text's voice is authoritative yet instructional, reflecting a bank's need to educate clients on compliance.
Taxable Instruments and Their Definitions
The guide opens by listing instruments subject to tax: trade and bankers' acceptances, post-dated checks expressly payable after date, and time drafts drawn against exempt proceeds. It specifies that drafts stating no time for payment become taxable upon acceptance for future payment. The language is deliberately narrow—'any instrument or writing operating as a renewal' is taxable, but 'mere suspension of payment or forbearance' is not. This careful wording shows an effort to prevent overreach while ensuring compliance.
The text also notes that payment of interest in advance after maturity, evidenced by an indorsement, constitutes a taxable renewal. Such distinctions reveal the guide's practical aim: to help bankers and businesses identify exactly when a stamp is required.
Liability and Responsibility for Stamps
Liability is determined solely by the form and face of a check or draft, the guide states, and cannot be affected by proof of facts or instructions outside the instrument. This rule simplifies enforcement but places a burden on parties to inspect documents. The obligation to affix and cancel stamps rests on the drawee, payee, or indorsee of a draft, while both parties to a promissory note share responsibility.
The guide's voice shifts from definition to instruction, using imperative constructions: 'Payment for the stamp is a matter for adjustment between the parties, but obligation rests upon the drawee...' This tone reflects the bank's role as an intermediary, offering clarity to avoid disputes.
Exemptions and Territorial Scope
The guide defines the term 'United States' to include states, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, and Alaska, establishing the tax's geographic reach. It lists exempt instruments, though the excerpts do not detail them fully. The text's structure—moving from general rule to specific exceptions—mirrors legal drafting, with numbered lists for taxable items and conditional clauses for exemptions.
Notably, the guide emphasizes that tax is determined by the instrument's form, not intent. This principle recurs throughout, reinforcing a theme of objective criteria over subjective interpretation. The prose remains concise, avoiding rhetorical flourish, which suits its purpose as a reference manual.
Readers should approach this guide as a period-specific legal interpretation, not a modern tax handbook. Its value lies in its precise language and the assumptions it reveals about early 20th-century financial practices. The text's brevity—under 5,000 words—belies its density; each sentence carries regulatory weight. For those studying fiscal policy or banking history, it offers a clear window into the mechanics of stamp taxation.
Fingering those dry pages on stamp taxes, I remembered how precisely rules once governed even paper’s passage—and yet how swiftly they could be overturned. There’s a strange comfort in that old exactness, beside the raw, aching order of confinement in A fragment of the prison experiences of Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman In the State Prison at Jefferson City, Mo., and the U. S. Penitentiary at Atlanta, Ga. February — A Reader’s Guide. Both worlds, so different, held by their own severe, quiet codes.